It is done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8935

El mar., 3 mar. 2020 a las 10:06, Julian Reschke (<julian.resc...@gmx.de>)
escribió:

> On 03.03.2020 15:48, jorgeeflorez . wrote:
> >>
> >> First step would be to upgrade to 1.24.0
> >>
> > We just upgraded from 1.5 last year. I guess I will not find much trouble
> > upgrading from 1.12, right?
>
> 1.5 was an unstable branch, you shouldn't use that in production anyway.
>
> 1.24.0 has replaced 1.12.0 as latest stable release.
>
> > the output of "ipconfig -a" for that machine would be helpful.
> >>
> >
> > Here is the output, MAC changed and IP addresses hidden/changed.
> >
> > docker0   Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 02:4E:C5:4B:C5:E5
> >            inet addr:xxx.xx.x.x  Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx  Mask:xxx.xxx.x.x
> >            UP BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
> >            RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >            TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >            collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> >            RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
> >
> > eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 06:C5:FB:F8:CF:C7
> >            inet addr:xxx.xx.xx.xx  Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> Mask:xxx.xxx.xxx.xx
> >            inet6 addr: fe80::4c8:fafd:fec1:cfc0/64 Scope:Link
> >            UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:9001  Metric:1
> >            RX packets:2694 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >            TX packets:2721 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >            collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> >            RX bytes:306659 (299.4 KiB)  TX bytes:343151 (335.1 KiB)
> >
> > lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
> >            inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
> >            inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
> >            UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
> >            RX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> >            TX packets:35 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> >            collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> >            RX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB)  TX bytes:81477 (79.5 KiB)
> > ...
>
> Ack. So yes, it probably would be good to extend the hack that we
> introduced in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3885 for that
> interface.
>
> Can you open a Jira ticket for this?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>

Reply via email to