>So, this is not about RDB, but about using the DocumentNodeStoreService
or not, right?
Yes, This is not about RDB ,Its about using osgi service, here i am
using DocumentNodeStoreService.
In scenario 2: i have injected datascource,and Using
DocumentNodeStoreService created repository .
i can store data and create index but not able to do full text search.
In scenario 1: i have created DocumentNodeStre created dataSource
using RDBDataSourceFactory and created DocumentNodeStore using
RDBDocumentNodeStoreBuilder insted of injecting osgi service.
Using this scenario fulltext search working correctly
may be i am missing something while creating repository while using
osgi service?
but if you see my code i have used same code to create repository only
difference is
DocumentNodeStoreService.
In scenario 1 , i have provided DocumenNodeStore and In scenario 2: i
have provided
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:45 AM Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de>
wrote:
> On 06.03.2020 05:47, Sandeep Ambule wrote:
> > *In scenario 1 *, I have created a repository using a node store created
> > using RDBDocumentNodeStoreBuilder
> >
> > public DocumentNodeStore createRDBStore(){String
> > jdbcurl="jdbc:postgresql://127.0.0.1:5432/SP05";String
> > user="postgres";String pw="manager";DataSource dataSource =
> > RDBDataSourceFactory.forJdbcUrl(jdbcurl, user, pw);
> >
> > DocumentNodeStore store = new
> > RDBDocumentNodeStoreBuilder().newRDBDocumentNodeStoreBuilder()
> > .setRDBConnection(dataSource).build();
> > return store;
> >
> > }
> >
> >
> > *In scenario 2: i have created a repository by autowiring *NodeStore
> > *osgi service.*
> >
> >
> > *i have given both scenario 1 and scenario 2 code in previous mail.*
>
> Yes. But we are all volunteers here, so it's good to provide all the
> information you have in a form that makes the question easier to
> understand.
>
> > *major difference in scenario 1 and scenario 2 is , In scenario 2 i am
> > using nodestore osgi service.*
>
> So, this is not about RDB, but about using the DocumentNodeStoreService
> or not, right? If it works with the latter, it's likely it's setting up
> in addition to what you do in scenario 1, no?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
