hi julian that's perfect. i wasn't entirely sure about 1.10 but if it's retired i will avoid the extra work. thanks for the information, very much appreciated.
angela ________________________________ From: Julian Reschke <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 1:36 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Angela Schreiber <[email protected]> Subject: Re: backport OAK-9059 to 1.10 and 1.22 On 14.05.2020 13:13, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi > > i intend to backport the fix for OAK-9059 to the 1.10 and 1.22 branches. the > risk should be very limited as it only requires modifications to > o.a.j.oak.spi.security.authorization.cug.impl.NestedCugHook. > > let me know i you have any concerns. > ... +1 for 1.22 - but there's no need to touch the 1.10 branch: it is retired. Best regards, Julian
