hi afaik the test class you refer to in the ticket summary was added in the light of OAK-9275.
kind regards angela ________________________________ From: Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:54 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org> Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan Am 21.01.2021 um 15:47 schrieb Angela Schreiber: > hi julian > > so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in > OAK-9324<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324> and nor did i see it > failing in the integration. so, not sure this should block the release given > that it might be limited to windows. > also note: the ticket you link as likely root cause for the failing test > (OAK-9275<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9275>) was about > restoring test-coverage (caused by > OAK-8769<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8769>). > ... Well yes, it most certainly has to do with the Windows platform. I can only state that tests did pass up to this change, and now they fail. As such, if there was a release vote, I would have to vote "-1". If this is not a regression of the code per se, but just tests that did not run before, then the right thing would be to disable these tests on Windows, and link that change to the ticket. Best regards, Julian
