Thanks a lot for looking into this and updating it. I added some more hints in 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10500 how to easily exclude certain 
modules from the Javadoc Aggregate creation.

Konrad

> On 18. Oct 2023, at 10:18, Julian Reschke <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 15.10.2023 15:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 13.10.2023 11:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I did some checks yesterday, and we have multiple problems here (I'll
>>> try to summarize in a ticket).
>>> 
>>> On top of the shaded Guava issue (which we may be able to fix by
>>> separating it from the main project), there are also issues caused by
>>> the fact that we're trying to create aggregate docs for a large set of
>>> projects which not always use the same version of dependencies (think
>>> embedding Lucene), and there's no simple fix for that.
>>> ...
>> 
>> In the meantime, I managed to run the javadoc production for 1.46.0 and
>> 1.48.0, so we are now two versions further.
>> 
>> 1.50.0 fails for me; this is likely because it's on Java 11, whereas
>> 1.48.0 was still Java 8. Creating the Javadocs for 1.48.0 with Java 11
>> fails as well.
>> 
>> Best regards, Julian
> 
> OK, I've been able to (mostly) update the docs to 1.58.0. The process
> requires manual intervention and skips a few projects that pull in
> incompatible versions of Lucene.
> 
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10500 for details.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Reply via email to