rishabhdaim commented on code in PR #2461:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/2461#discussion_r2290658592
##########
oak-segment-tar/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/segment/standby/codec/ResponseDecoder.java:
##########
@@ -203,11 +205,21 @@ private static void decodeGetReferencesResponse(int
length, ByteBuf in, List<Obj
}
private static long hash(byte[] data) {
- return
Hashing.murmur3_32().newHasher().putBytes(data).hash().padToLong();
+ return Integer.toUnsignedLong(MurmurHash3.hash32x86(data));
}
private static long hash(byte mask, long blobLength, byte[] data) {
- return
Hashing.murmur3_32().newHasher().putByte(mask).putLong(blobLength).putBytes(data).hash().padToLong();
+
+ final ByteBuffer byteBuffer = ByteBuffer.allocate(1 + 8 + data.length)
+ .order(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN) // To align with Guava that
uses Little Endianess
+ .put(mask)
+ .putLong(blobLength)
+ .put(data);
+ byteBuffer.flip(); // Reset position to start to read data from
beginning
+ final byte[] bytes = new byte[byteBuffer.limit()];
+ byteBuffer.get(bytes);
Review Comment:
Yes, it can be used, the above test passes with `ByteBuffer#array()` as well.
Reason for not using it is to avoid any uninitialized values to interfere
with hash calculation. But the `ByteBuffer#flip()` handles that case as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: oak-dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
