[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13661873#comment-13661873
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-831:
-----------------------------------
What's the benefit that we couldn't achieve by improving the in-content storage
of the index?
I'm concerned that we're opting for the simple solution here without
considering the extra cost of maintaining separate copies of the index across
backups and multiple cluster nodes.
> Lucene filesystem based index
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-831
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: oak-lucene
> Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
> Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
> Fix For: 0.8
>
>
> As an alternative to the existing index which saves the index files in the
> repository, I'm proposing one that uses the file system.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
