[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13781661#comment-13781661
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-659:
-----------------------------------
[~jukkaz] I think we can resolve this, WDYT? I'd open a follow up issue for the
problem with large number of transient changes in commit hooks [mentioned above
|
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-659?focusedCommentId=13772908&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13772908].
> Move purge logic for transient changes below the NodeBuilder interface
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-659
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-659
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Michael Dürig
> Attachments: OAK-659-2.patch, OAK-659.patch
>
>
> Currently transient changes are purged down to a persisted branch once a
> certain size threshold is hit. This logic currently resides in {{RootImpl}}.
> However this approach doesn't catch the case where a lot of content is added
> by a commit hook (e.g. index updates) since commit hooks operate on the
> {{NodeBuilder}} level which is below {{Root}}.
> The aim of this issue is to pursue ways to push the purge logic further down
> below the {{NodeBuilder}} interface.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
