[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965437#comment-13965437
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-1702:
--------------------------------------
Current status
* I am reworking the patch for sharing the IndexSearchers as per Alex comments.
Earlier it relied on NodeStore. Now it would rely on NodeState passed to the
query method.
* With sharing also there was not much improvement when you read say 100+
results. Only when we disabled storing of content in index and then disabling
the compression the results came near to JR2 level.
So once the patch is ready we can then try if two other optimizations
(disabling compression and disabling storage of text in index) is required or
not.
> Create a benchmark for Full text search
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: bench
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attachments: OAK-1702-hack.patch, OAK-1702-lazy-cursor.patch,
> OAK-1702-shared-indexer.patch, OAK-1702.oakcodec.patch, OAK-1702.patch
>
>
> To compare the performance of Full text search between Jackrabbit 2 and Oak a
> benchmark should be added.
> To start with the benchmark would do following
> * Would be based on WikipediaImport benchmark. So it would import the
> wikipedia dump and perform full text query on that
> * Should be able to run on both JR2 and Oak. Need to account for maven setup
> to handle different Lucene version as JR2 uses 3.6.0 and Oak use 4.x
> Later we can add concurrent version
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
