[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965455#comment-13965455
 ] 

Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-1702:
--------------------------------------

bq. I would rather get the base state from the indexer (or alternatively a 
related observer), as there we know for sure when the index has changed.

That can be done but currently I do not see a simple way to share that 
information betweena provider and editor. And further that would not work in a 
cluster where indexing happens only on one of the nodes

> Create a benchmark for Full text search
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: bench
>            Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>            Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>         Attachments: OAK-1702-hack.patch, OAK-1702-lazy-cursor.patch, 
> OAK-1702-shared-indexer.patch, OAK-1702.oakcodec.patch, OAK-1702.patch
>
>
> To compare the performance of Full text search between Jackrabbit 2 and Oak a 
> benchmark should be added.
> To start with the benchmark would do following
> * Would be based on WikipediaImport benchmark. So it would import the 
> wikipedia dump and perform full text query on that
> * Should be able to run on both JR2 and Oak. Need to account for maven setup 
> to handle different Lucene version as JR2 uses 3.6.0 and Oak use 4.x
> Later we can add concurrent version



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to