[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965472#comment-13965472
]
Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-1702:
------------------------------------
bq. That can be done but currently I do not see a simple way to share that
information between a provider and editor
The provider and the editor can be two sides of the same component that just
provides both services.
bq. And further that would not work in a cluster where indexing happens only on
one of the nodes.
Good point. So an observer/indexprovider combo might work better.
> Create a benchmark for Full text search
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-1702
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1702
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: bench
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attachments: OAK-1702-hack.patch, OAK-1702-lazy-cursor.patch,
> OAK-1702-shared-indexer.patch, OAK-1702.oakcodec.patch, OAK-1702.patch
>
>
> To compare the performance of Full text search between Jackrabbit 2 and Oak a
> benchmark should be added.
> To start with the benchmark would do following
> * Would be based on WikipediaImport benchmark. So it would import the
> wikipedia dump and perform full text query on that
> * Should be able to run on both JR2 and Oak. Need to account for maven setup
> to handle different Lucene version as JR2 uses 3.6.0 and Oak use 4.x
> Later we can add concurrent version
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
