[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16066783#comment-16066783
 ] 

Matt Ryan commented on OAK-6388:
--------------------------------

[~akalfas] I was referring to the comment, not the value of the constant.  I 
agree, if we were to want to change "accessKey" to something else that's a 
separate issue.  My point is that the JavaDoc comment should accurately 
describe what the variable actually represents, and in this case the variable 
represents an account name, not a key, so the comment should reflect that.

> Enable Azure shared access signature for blob store connector
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6388
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6388
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: blob-cloud
>            Reporter: Andrei Kalfas
>         Attachments: AzureSAS.patch, AzureSAS-v2.patch
>
>
> Azure storage account can be access with access keys or with shared access 
> signatures. Currently the blob connector only allows access keys, limiting 
> the use cases where the storage account must be regarded as a read only one. 
> Access keys enable all access while shared access signatures can be limited 
> to certain operations. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to