[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16573298#comment-16573298
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-7686:
-------------------------------------
The problem is, with the current patch breaks the contract of hybrid v2 indexes
(synchronous properties,... specially unique properties).
I'm fine with the patch, if it logs a big fat warning that the index is not up
to date.
The right solution (in my view) would be to add oak-lucene to oak-upgrade, even
if that means we need to "split" oak-upgrade so we can get rid of Jackrabbit
Core / old Lucene in one of the cases.
> Partial migration doesn't update Lucene indexing data
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7686
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: upgrade
> Reporter: Tomek Rękawek
> Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-7686.patch
>
>
> It seems that the LuceneIndexProvider is missing in the RepositorySidegrade
> index provider list. As a result, for the partial migration, the lucene
> indexing data is not updated for the copied content:
> {noformat}
> 25.07.2018 00:19:47.008 [main] *WARN*
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate - Missing index provider
> of type [lucene], requesting reindex on [/oak:index/slingeventJob]
> 25.07.2018 00:19:47.580 [main] *WARN*
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate - Missing index provider
> of type [lucene], requesting reindex on [/oak:index/ntBaseLucene]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
