[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16573937#comment-16573937
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-7686:
------------------------------------
Thanks for the review [~tmueller]. I've opened OAK-7696 for the right solution
you mentioned (actually I've diverged a bit... but the idea is towards
"oak-upgrade, instead of avoiding missing-provider-error, should at least do
hybridV2 indexing"
That said, since what we're discussing is kind of an edge case and can be
warned against, I'm going to change {{log.debug}} to {{log.warn}} in my patch
(and probably re-word it) and commit it for quick resolution of this issue.
> Partial migration doesn't update Lucene indexing data
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7686
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: upgrade
> Reporter: Tomek Rękawek
> Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.10
>
> Attachments: OAK-7686.patch
>
>
> It seems that the LuceneIndexProvider is missing in the RepositorySidegrade
> index provider list. As a result, for the partial migration, the lucene
> indexing data is not updated for the copied content:
> {noformat}
> 25.07.2018 00:19:47.008 [main] *WARN*
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate - Missing index provider
> of type [lucene], requesting reindex on [/oak:index/slingeventJob]
> 25.07.2018 00:19:47.580 [main] *WARN*
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate - Missing index provider
> of type [lucene], requesting reindex on [/oak:index/ntBaseLucene]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
