Good notes. Please apply the following fixes to them...
To the list of new OAuth RFCs since the last meeting please also add:
draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
Please change:
Mike: If the access_token is used, then we must add to spec that it's
there for historic reasons and say that it's actually not always the same token.
to:
Mike: If the access_token is used, then we must add to spec that it's
there for historic reasons and say that it's actually not always an access
token.
Please change:
Consensus: For use of existing params defined in OAuth.
to:
Consensus: For use of existing params defined in OAuth, while allowing
some to be optional when not needed.
Please change:
Mike: Microsoft oauth2 server have a 'resource' param to indicate the
audience.
to:
Mike: Microsoft oauth2 server has a 'resource' param to indicate the
resource that the access token will be used to access.
whitely used -> widely used
We need to go on with out lives -> We need to go on with our lives
ready to a shepherd write-up -> ready for a shepherd write-up
Finally, I would add a note saying:
Some additional drafts are planned, including draft-jones-amr-values
and draft-ietf-oauth-discovery
Thanks
-- Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting Minutes
Here are the notes from our meeting yesterday:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fproceedings%2f93%2fminutes%2fminutes-93-oauth&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7ccb085108ecb0454b33c008d293699b85%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=5GiVy2SivZk6GWeoXtabbQG1q3r1%2bL%2fnM4o2BmH5Kv8%3d
Thanks to Erik for taking notes.
Please let me know if something is missing or incorrect within the next
2 weeks.
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth