My sense of the consensus in the room is as Justin describes it. On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Justin Richer <jric...@mit.edu> wrote:
> > Consensus: For use of existing params defined in OAuth, while allowing > some to be optional when not needed. > > That was not the consensus as I understood it in the room. The consensus > was the first portion, as originally noted. The second portion was Mike’s > requested amendment, and it (and other aspects like the value of > token_type) were brought up as details that the editors would work on and > come back to the list. > > — Justin > > > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 7:07 AM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > > Good notes. Please apply the following fixes to them... > > > > To the list of new OAuth RFCs since the last meeting please also add: > > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token > > draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer > > draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer > > > > Please change: > > Mike: If the access_token is used, then we must add to spec that > it's there for historic reasons and say that it's actually not always the > same token. > > to: > > Mike: If the access_token is used, then we must add to spec that > it's there for historic reasons and say that it's actually not always an > access token. > > > > Please change: > > Consensus: For use of existing params defined in OAuth. > > to: > > Consensus: For use of existing params defined in OAuth, while > allowing some to be optional when not needed. > > > > Please change: > > Mike: Microsoft oauth2 server have a 'resource' param to indicate > the audience. > > to: > > Mike: Microsoft oauth2 server has a 'resource' param to indicate > the resource that the access token will be used to access. > > > > whitely used -> widely used > > > > We need to go on with out lives -> We need to go on with our lives > > > > ready to a shepherd write-up -> ready for a shepherd write-up > > > > Finally, I would add a note saying: > > Some additional drafts are planned, including > draft-jones-amr-values and draft-ietf-oauth-discovery > > > > Thanks > > -- Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes > Tschofenig > > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:19 AM > > To: oauth@ietf.org > > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting Minutes > > > > Here are the notes from our meeting yesterday: > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.ietf.org%2fproceedings%2f93%2fminutes%2fminutes-93-oauth&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7ccb085108ecb0454b33c008d293699b85%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=5GiVy2SivZk6GWeoXtabbQG1q3r1%2bL%2fnM4o2BmH5Kv8%3d > > > > Thanks to Erik for taking notes. > > > > Please let me know if something is missing or incorrect within the next > > 2 weeks. > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
