Hi Sascha,

> Am 22.04.2019 um 20:34 schrieb Sascha Preibisch <[email protected]>:
> 
> Thank you for the article, Torsten!

my pleasure :-) 

> 
> I like that 'scope' is out of the game for these kinds of authorizations.
> 
> What I can see for the general use case is a required identifier
> within the 'structures_scope' document that identifies the profile it
> should be used for.

What does profile mean in this context?

best regards,
Torsten.
> 
> Thank you,
> Sascha
> 
> Am Sa., 20. Apr. 2019 um 11:21 Uhr schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt
> <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I just published an article about the subject at: 
>> https://medium.com/oauth-2/transaction-authorization-or-why-we-need-to-re-think-oauth-scopes-2326e2038948
>> 
>> I look forward to getting your feedback.
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> Torsten.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to