> 4) if your wheel does not fit this description, that does not mean > it 
> is illegal

No, but what it does mean, is that if your wheels are older than 1-2 
years, you are screwed because manufacturers are most likely never going 
to submit 10 or 25 discontinued wheels for testing.

However, at the OCA Sanctioned Good Friday Road Race on March 29th, 2002 
some riders got away with riding Rolf Vector Comps and Pros. I myself 
have the Vector Comps and would like to ride them, but I just can not 
risk having a protest again my wheels. 
 
> 5) there is an additional document at the following url:
> 
>    www.uic.ch/english/about/wheels.htm


> 6) The list includes Zipp (thank you God), Spinergy, Shimano, and
>    Mavic Ksyrium & Cosmic as well as other "non-standard" models.

Actually, where the list says Zipp, it only means the new re-engineered 
Zip rims that I believe were only recently modified. If you have had 
older Zip rims, they are probably illegal too. However, most comminsares 
will either not know this or not care, and you will most likely be able 
to use an older zip wheel. The Zip rims originally failed the UCI test, 
because the spokes ripped out of the rim and becuase the way were left 
hanging, this was considered unsafe. So, Zip re-engineered the wheel to 
collapse on its self, making it a weaker, but "safer" rim.

See the below link for the full story:

http://www.bike.com/features/template.asp?page=2&lsectionnumber=6&lsectiondirectory=techno&date=2%2F27%2F2002

------
Club Office:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (613) 230-1064
Web/mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb
Newsletter:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.cyberus.ca/~obcweb/Newsletter

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: [email protected]

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aVxiDo.a2i8p1
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to