Are we not going away from the purpose of ONW and concententrating of petty things instead of crime?
2009/5/29 Trevor Hughes <[email protected]> > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Rob Gaylard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Johnny > > Can you remove your by-line? It get repetitive and clutters up your > > messages? > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know Rob - a three line sig is perfectly acceptable I would > have thought - of course it would be more interesting if it was > rotated - there are free software implementations out there that would > do that of course! > > As long as we do not have people doing major advertising or 20 line > signatures - or possible even worse huge pictures as signatures we are > alright. > > Possible the major thing wrong with that signature is that is not > preceded bu the standard -- to denote a signature block - most mail > programs are able to intelligently handle signatures so denoted so a > signature should be like this > > -- > this is my sig > this is the end of my sig > > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I love you, not only for what you are, But for what I am when I am with you." --Roy Croft Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Observatory Neighbourhood watch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/obsnw?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
