Hey Folks For simplicity, I think we should keep the current lists and start the following behaviours:
- All OO comms that are not related to private or otherwise confidential discussions, including Board comms, go to the oceania@ list - Private OO Board comms go to oceania-board@ list. If we want to clarify that the second list should be private, I think we can change it to oceania-board-private, but I don't really want to create another list... let's keep it as simple as possible! Cheers, Alex On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:35, Greg Lauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Trisha - can you better define 'Board discussions'? Is this *all > *communication > between board members? Or those related to a particular decision making > process? > > If we are to replicate an OSgeo Board list then for it to be of any value > Board and members should have read/write privileges whist community have > read access only > > Greg > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 6:17 PM Adam Steer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Trisha >> >> Thanks - for a board 'general business list' I reckon the ideal is >> 'anyone can subscribe, but only specific people can post without moderation >> - and all archives are open'. Mailman has plenty of power to vary a >> subscribers posting power as needed. We can get all these switches flicked >> on oceania-board easily, there's only a small task to audit the archives >> for anything which meets in-camera requirements. >> >> A few OSGeo lists operate this way, including giving and taking power for >> unmoderated posting to individuals as required for specific discussions. >> >> I think clear identification of the circumstances for in-camera >> discussion is great, thanks! >> >> We still need to add this list as means of communication - I've added >> suggestions to the linked doc. >> >> Regards, >> >> Adam >> >> >> >> On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 at 02:51, Trisha Moriarty <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thank you for your comments and it's great to see active discussion on >>> the draft ToR v2.0. We can certainly make the requested modifications to >>> the Board's communication processes and the ToR can be modified to reflect >>> the changed practice. >>> >>> So just to confirm that I understand the new process... >>> >>> The Oceania-board list is to be made public, that is open for all >>> community members to subscribe to. Having the dedicated board list will >>> make it easier to track and filter conversations in our inboxes. >>> The board will use the Oceania Board list for all board communications, >>> except for those where privacy is deemed necessary. >>> A new list called Ocean-board-private will be used for these >>> conversations, ensuring they can be archived. >>> We will list those circumstances in the ToR, so it is clear when the >>> Oceania-board-private list can be used. >>> Currently there are two circumstances >>> 1. code of conduct breaches >>> 2. commercial in confidence matters >>> Are there any more? Do we need to be more specific with the >>> commercial in confidence matters? >>> >>> I have created a V2.1 on google drive and modified to the Communication >>> Section to reflect the new processes mentioned above. This is obviously >>> still open for further suggestions and refinement of both the processes and >>> wording. >>> >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mwuJeE_NunKieUP6z4yHSmvlAd8B4ZOHD0qBqeY6DyY/edit?usp=sharing >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oceania mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania >> > _______________________________________________ > Oceania mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania > -- Alex Leith m: 0419189050
_______________________________________________ Oceania mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/oceania
