We'll try to come up with a workaround. Generally, Leptonica will likely be dropped as a requirement for OCRopus when the built-in text/image segmentation catches up with Leptonica; that will simplify builds and configuration.
Tom On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:23, Brad Hards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 November 2008 05:05:58 pm shao.d wrote: > > leptonlib-1.58 moved its header files to be under > > liblept > > and not the old leptonica. OCRopus attempts to guess the include > > header's path in configure.ac. Depending on which versions of > > packages one uses, chaos results. > This is not the problem. The headers _are_being found. The current version > of > configure.ac (in svn) checks for both of the leptonica header locations. > > The problem is a link-time option. > > > See OCRopus issue 120 at > > http://code.google.com/p/ocropus/issues/detail?id=120 > > I know the OCRopus developers are extremely busy, but there's a > > gigantic problem with how include paths are specified in OCRopus that > > really needs to be fixed now. Fortunately no work on their part needs > > to be done--I've already included the patch that fixes it all. And > > the bigger patch that enables libtool as well fixes everything such as > > configure.ac. > That patch can't possibly fix this issue. > > Brad > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ocropus" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
