On Nov 25, 8:28 am, "Thomas Breuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We'll try to come up with a workaround.
>
> Generally, Leptonica will likely be dropped as a requirement for OCRopus
> when the built-in text/image segmentation catches up with Leptonica; that
> will simplify builds and configuration.
>
How essential is Leptonica to the accuracy of the recognition quality
(or speed?) of this software?
I currently have a (presumably) working version of ocropus, compiled "
--without-fst --without-leptonica ". Should I persist in integrating
FST and Leptonica into my build? (I say "presumably" because it
currently complains about my tesseract not being trained/configured
(with box pairs?))
Thanks
andrew
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ocropus" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/ocropus?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
