On 27/12/2008, David Bateman <dbate...@dbateman.org> wrote: > Luca, > > I think the control toolbox might be considered as orphaned as not much > has been done on it for a few years, as you are interested in making it > more compatible then you should probably be made the maintainer of this > package.. The changes you propose to my naive eye all seem to make sense...
Mantaining the "control" package? Ok. At least until the end of January 2009 I could improve this package. After that date, I could stay in "bug fix only" mode, listening at the octave-forge (this) list. After becoming the mantainer of this package, how should I commit changes on it? I think I should: -silently commit trivial changes -silently commit new functions -ask for review on this list for big changes that could cause regressions, and then commit them Is this ok? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
