Luca Favatella wrote:
On 27/12/2008, David Bateman <dbate...@dbateman.org> wrote:
Luca,

I think the control toolbox might be considered as orphaned as not much
has been done on it for a few years, as you are interested in making it
more compatible then you should probably be made the maintainer of this
package.. The changes you propose to my naive eye all seem to make sense...

Mantaining the "control" package?
Ok.

At least until the end of January 2009 I could improve this package.
After that date, I could stay in "bug fix only" mode, listening at the
octave-forge (this) list.



After becoming the mantainer of this package, how should I commit changes on it?
I think I should:
-silently commit trivial changes
-silently commit new functions
-ask for review on this list for big changes that could cause
regressions, and then commit them
Is this ok?
That is pretty much what we all do :-)

D.

--
David Bateman                                dbate...@dbateman.org
35 rue Gambetta                              +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home)
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE            +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to