Hi all,
deleting leval.cc should be ok. Iirc, it was created mainly for the
optimization functions and has no advantage over feval (funcName,
argCell{:}), now that octave has cells.
If anyone has tons of code riddled with lists, it should be easy
enough to have list look-alike functions implemented in terms of cells.
Just my 2c,
Etienne
Quoting Thomas Weber <twe...@debian.org> (Fri, 21 May 2010 20:18:39 +0200):
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:42:50PM +0200, Michael Creel wrote:
>> I checked in a modified Makefile so that leval.cc is not compiled. I
>> guess that leval.cc could be removed, but maybe we should wait on that
>> (?).
>
> If you think it's superfluous, delete it now. If someone needs it later,
> they can (and will) complain. However, four weeks from now no one will
> remember to delete leval.cc, if it's still there.
>
> Thomas
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Octave-dev mailing list
> Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
>
--
http://www.isr.ist.utl.pt/~etienne
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
