fre, 21 05 2010 kl. 09:53 +0200, skrev Alois Schlögl:
> Søren Hauberg wrote:
> > lør, 20 03 2010 kl. 19:36 +0100, skrev Michael Creel:
> >> I think that replacing list with cell arrays is pretty
> >> straightforward. I did that for samin and bfgsmin quite a while ago,
> >> when lists were deprecated. I suggest that the authors of the
> >> functions in question take care of this before Octave 3.4 appears. If
> >> they don't, then functions that stop working can be moved to a "deep
> >> freeze" directory, so that they can be recovered when someone has time
> >> to work on them.
> > 
> > This is fine by me.
> > 
> > The following functions seem to be using lists at the moment. Unless
> > they are fixed by the time Octave 3.4 is released, they will be put in a
> > directory that is not installed as part of the package.
> > 
> >         d2_min.m
> >         fminunc_compat.m
> >         line_min.m
> >         minimize.m
> >         nelder_mead_min.m
> >         test_d2_min_2.m
> >         test_d2_min_3.m
> >         test_fminunc_1.m
> >         test_min_3.m
> >         test_min_4.m
> >         test_minimize_1.m
> >         test_nelder_mead_min_1.m
> >         deriv.m
> >         optimset_compat.m
> >         __semi_bracket.m
> > 
> > So, if you care about any of these functions, please speak up.
> > 
> 
> I've replaced all list elements in optim. According to my tests, these 
> tests work fine:
>       test_d2_min_1         %   ok
>       test_d2_min_2         %   ok
>       test_d2_min_3         %   ok
>       test_nelder_mead_min_2%   ok
>       test_wpolyfit         %   ok
>       test_min_3            %   ok
> 
> I guess, this means that most other functions (like d2_min, line_min, 
> deriv, minimize, nelder_mead_min, and fminunc_compat are also fine. )
> 
> The following tests are still failing
>       test_min_4            % ffailed
>       test_minimize_1       %  failed
>       test_nelder_mead_min_1%  failed
>       test_fminunc_1        %  failed
> 
> test_min_4 fails with the following usage error:
> usage: bfgsmin: 1st element of 3rd argument (iteration limit) must be 
> Inf or positive integer.
> Perhaps, this test is broken?
> The other tests fail with a segmentation fault - so there is at least a 
> problem somewhere else, too.
> 
> Is it ok to commit this these changes ?

Sorry about the late reply.

Could you please post the changes you are suggesting (the actual diff's)
to this list?

Søren


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev

Reply via email to