On 25 Jun 2012, at 10:11, Paul Dreik wrote:
> The discussion I referred to is here:
> http://gnu-octave-repository.2306053.n4.nabble.com/Sockets-error-td3981398.html#a3981400
>
> Paul
Thanks for the pointer, I'll have a look this evening to see whether there is
another way to keep backward
compatibility without checking for version numbers.
Before I spend time on this, why not just tell users of old versions of Octave
to use a prior version of
the package and instruct those who want the latest version to update to a newer
Octave?
c.
P.S. I think there might be a typo in tis line of sockets.cc:
DEFUNX_DLD ( "AF_LOCAL", FAFL_OCAL, FSAF_LOCAL, args, nargout, "socket
constant" )
{ error( "AF_LOCAL address family not supported on this platform" ); return
octave_value(); };
shouldn't it be " FAF_LOCAL" rather than "FAFL_OCAL" ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Octave-dev mailing list
Octave-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev
