You aren't wrong, I add RCX all the time, then instantly regret it when I show other people! :)
There was a lot of discussion about git and its mutable tags a while ago, I don't think there is a hard and fast rule on how you tag, but bear in mind, if you send out a vote email into the archive and someone tries to trace it back 5 years later, that tag pointer still needs to exist, you shouldn't rename tags IMHO. So you might tag 0.6-RC1 then 0.6, thats your own choice and largely down to how you document the ODF Toolkit release process. Anyway, yeah cancel the vote, rerelease and open a new vote. Tom On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Svante Schubert <[email protected]> wrote: > No problem at all. I fully agree with you now, when I have chosen the > suffix about a week ago, I thought it was a splendid idea... > > Please correct me if I am wrong in the following: > I will use no RCx suffix on the Nexus server for staging. So far it is > obvious, but shouldn't we use the suffix on dev and tag directory and > rename/move it after the vote passes? > > In any case, I assume the correct procedure is to stop the current vote and > I will fix it right away and reinitate the vote again, right? > > Cheers, > Svante > > 2017-03-09 15:09 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber <[email protected]>: > > > Okay, I put half an incubator hat on and check RAT, the build, the > licenses > > and disclaimers etc which look okay at a quick glance. > > > > But, I'm going to -1 this release currently because of the RC1 tag in the > > names. When its released its no longer an RC but then the hashes etc > don't > > match. Rebuild it without the RC tag in the version and I think it'll be > > good to go. > > > > Sorry to be annoying! :) > > > > Tom > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Svante Schubert < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Ian, > > > > > > Yes it is the head. > > > > > > Regarding Tom's question of the tag being used: We are not yet moved to > > > GIT, so the subversion tag is just a copied repository directory in the > > tag > > > directory: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/ > > > odftoolkit-0.6.2-incubating-RC1/ > > > Of course Tom is right, I will mention the tag next time directly to > make > > > the build easy reproduceable. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Svante > > > > > > > > > 2017-03-09 14:25 GMT+01:00 Ian C <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > Hi Svante, > > > > > > > > is the release the same as the head? > > > > > > > > I updated my repository to the head and ran mvn install. > > > > > > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------ > > > > [INFO] Reactor Summary: > > > > [INFO] > > > > [INFO] Apache ODF Toolkit ................................. SUCCESS > [ > > > > 44.576 s] > > > > [INFO] ODF Custom Javadoc Taglets ......................... SUCCESS [ > > > > 35.931 s] > > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Parent POM .... SUCCESS [ > > > > 0.110 s] > > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Library ....... SUCCESS [ > > > > 48.878 s] > > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Maven2 Plugin . SUCCESS [ > > > > 9.065 s] > > > > [INFO] ODFDOM ............................................. SUCCESS > > > [06:43 > > > > min] > > > > [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner .................................... SUCCESS > [ > > > > 5.888 s] > > > > [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner Ant Task ........................... SUCCESS [ > > > > 0.449 s] > > > > [INFO] ODF Validator ...................................... SUCCESS > [ > > > > 28.376 s] > > > > [INFO] Simple Java API for ODF (Simple ODF) ............... SUCCESS > > > [02:00 > > > > min] > > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------ > > > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------ > > > > [INFO] Total time: 11:41 min > > > > [INFO] Finished at: 2017-03-09T21:22:10+08:00 > > > > [INFO] Final Memory: 106M/521M > > > > [INFO] > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > System is Windoze 10. Java 8. > > > > > > > > If the release is the head +1. > > > > > > > > If not I can get the release later.. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Ian > > > > > > > > P.S. Hi Tom, good to see a new face, so to speak. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Its normally useful to include a pointer to a git tag or similar > when > > > > > shooting out those emails so people can tell where you built the > code > > > > > from.... > > > > > > > > > > What tag did you use? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Svante Schubert < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have forgotten to vote for myself with +1 as release engineer > for > > > > this > > > > > > release candidat to become our next 0.6.2-incubating release. > > > > > > As a member of the Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) > this > > > is > > > > > the > > > > > > first of three +1 from PPMC required to pass this vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have build the release with Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux > 4.4.0-65-generic) > > > > using > > > > > > JDK 1.6.0_45 and the last available Apache-Maven for JDK 6 (i.e. > > > > 3.2.5). > > > > > I > > > > > > have chosen JDK6 as LibreOffice uses our ODF Validator for > > regression > > > > > tests > > > > > > on very old machines. As discussed before, we plan to switch > > > afterwards > > > > > to > > > > > > JDK 8 jumping directly to 0.7-SNAPSHOT to be able to use the > latest > > > > > version > > > > > > of Apache Jena for our W3C RDF support. > > > > > > In additon, the build and tests run successful under JDK 6,7,8 > with > > > > > Windows > > > > > > 10 and JDK 6 and 8 under Ubuntu. > > > > > > > > > > > > As usually, I have checked the JavaDoc that our taglets work > > > > successful. > > > > > > For those new here, JavaDoc taglets are being used to create > three > > > > types > > > > > of > > > > > > generic references from the JavaDoc classes to the ODF 1.2 > > > > specification > > > > > in > > > > > > HTML (elements, attributes and data types). > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Svante > > > > > > ᐧ > > > > > > > > > > > > 2017-03-05 18:30 GMT+01:00 Svante Schubert < > > > [email protected] > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the vote for 0.6.2-incubating-RC1 of Apache ODF Toolkit > > > > > > > (incubating). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close at the > end > > > of > > > > > 11th > > > > > > > of March (CET). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/ > > > > > > > dist/dev/incubator/odftoolkit/0.6.2-incubating-RC1/ or from > the > > > > Maven > > > > > > > staging repo here: https://repository.apache.org/ > > > > content/repositories/ > > > > > > > orgapacheodftoolkit-1004/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with key : 862EA1DEE2EC7D45 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with > 'FixVersion > > = > > > > > > > 0.6.2-incubating'. > > > > > > > You can view them here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/ > > > > > > > asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.2-incubating- > > RC1/CHANGES.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.6.2-incubating release > > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.6.2-incubating > release > > > > > > > because... > > > > > > > ᐧ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Tom Barber > > > > > CTO Spicule LTD > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > http://spicule.co.uk > > > > > > > > > > @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> > > > > > > > > > > Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> > > > > > > > > > > GB: +44(0)5603641316 > > > > > US: +18448141689 > > > > > > > > > > <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Ian C > > > > > > > > > > ᐧ > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tom Barber > > CTO Spicule LTD > > [email protected] > > > > http://spicule.co.uk > > > > @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> > > > > Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> > > > > GB: +44(0)5603641316 > > US: +18448141689 > > > > <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook> > > > -- Tom Barber CTO Spicule LTD [email protected] http://spicule.co.uk @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> GB: +44(0)5603641316 US: +18448141689 <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook>
