I did check the OODT release notes which I've done 100 times, in there we just tag with 0.6 no RC or anything. But I'll leave that up to you.
Tom On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> wrote: > You aren't wrong, I add RCX all the time, then instantly regret it when I > show other people! :) > > There was a lot of discussion about git and its mutable tags a while ago, > I don't think there is a hard and fast rule on how you tag, but bear in > mind, if you send out a vote email into the archive and someone tries to > trace it back 5 years later, that tag pointer still needs to exist, you > shouldn't rename tags IMHO. So you might tag 0.6-RC1 then 0.6, thats your > own choice and largely down to how you document the ODF Toolkit release > process. > > Anyway, yeah cancel the vote, rerelease and open a new vote. > > Tom > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Svante Schubert <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> No problem at all. I fully agree with you now, when I have chosen the >> suffix about a week ago, I thought it was a splendid idea... >> >> Please correct me if I am wrong in the following: >> I will use no RCx suffix on the Nexus server for staging. So far it is >> obvious, but shouldn't we use the suffix on dev and tag directory and >> rename/move it after the vote passes? >> >> In any case, I assume the correct procedure is to stop the current vote >> and >> I will fix it right away and reinitate the vote again, right? >> >> Cheers, >> Svante >> >> 2017-03-09 15:09 GMT+01:00 Tom Barber <[email protected]>: >> >> > Okay, I put half an incubator hat on and check RAT, the build, the >> licenses >> > and disclaimers etc which look okay at a quick glance. >> > >> > But, I'm going to -1 this release currently because of the RC1 tag in >> the >> > names. When its released its no longer an RC but then the hashes etc >> don't >> > match. Rebuild it without the RC tag in the version and I think it'll be >> > good to go. >> > >> > Sorry to be annoying! :) >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Svante Schubert < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hello Ian, >> > > >> > > Yes it is the head. >> > > >> > > Regarding Tom's question of the tag being used: We are not yet moved >> to >> > > GIT, so the subversion tag is just a copied repository directory in >> the >> > tag >> > > directory: >> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/odf/tags/ >> > > odftoolkit-0.6.2-incubating-RC1/ >> > > Of course Tom is right, I will mention the tag next time directly to >> make >> > > the build easy reproduceable. >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > Svante >> > > >> > > >> > > 2017-03-09 14:25 GMT+01:00 Ian C <[email protected]>: >> > > >> > > > Hi Svante, >> > > > >> > > > is the release the same as the head? >> > > > >> > > > I updated my repository to the head and ran mvn install. >> > > > >> > > > [INFO] >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> > ------------ >> > > > [INFO] Reactor Summary: >> > > > [INFO] >> > > > [INFO] Apache ODF Toolkit ................................. >> SUCCESS [ >> > > > 44.576 s] >> > > > [INFO] ODF Custom Javadoc Taglets ......................... SUCCESS >> [ >> > > > 35.931 s] >> > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Parent POM .... SUCCESS >> [ >> > > > 0.110 s] >> > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Library ....... SUCCESS >> [ >> > > > 48.878 s] >> > > > [INFO] XML Schema to Template Mapping Tool: Maven2 Plugin . SUCCESS >> [ >> > > > 9.065 s] >> > > > [INFO] ODFDOM ............................................. SUCCESS >> > > [06:43 >> > > > min] >> > > > [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner .................................... >> SUCCESS [ >> > > > 5.888 s] >> > > > [INFO] ODF XSLT-Runner Ant Task ........................... SUCCESS >> [ >> > > > 0.449 s] >> > > > [INFO] ODF Validator ...................................... >> SUCCESS [ >> > > > 28.376 s] >> > > > [INFO] Simple Java API for ODF (Simple ODF) ............... SUCCESS >> > > [02:00 >> > > > min] >> > > > [INFO] >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> > ------------ >> > > > [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS >> > > > [INFO] >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> > ------------ >> > > > [INFO] Total time: 11:41 min >> > > > [INFO] Finished at: 2017-03-09T21:22:10+08:00 >> > > > [INFO] Final Memory: 106M/521M >> > > > [INFO] >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ >> > ------------ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > System is Windoze 10. Java 8. >> > > > >> > > > If the release is the head +1. >> > > > >> > > > If not I can get the release later.. >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > >> > > > Ian >> > > > >> > > > P.S. Hi Tom, good to see a new face, so to speak. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Tom Barber <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Its normally useful to include a pointer to a git tag or similar >> when >> > > > > shooting out those emails so people can tell where you built the >> code >> > > > > from.... >> > > > > >> > > > > What tag did you use? >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks >> > > > > >> > > > > Tom >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Svante Schubert < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > I have forgotten to vote for myself with +1 as release engineer >> for >> > > > this >> > > > > > release candidat to become our next 0.6.2-incubating release. >> > > > > > As a member of the Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) >> this >> > > is >> > > > > the >> > > > > > first of three +1 from PPMC required to pass this vote. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I have build the release with Ubuntu 16.04 (Linux >> 4.4.0-65-generic) >> > > > using >> > > > > > JDK 1.6.0_45 and the last available Apache-Maven for JDK 6 (i.e. >> > > > 3.2.5). >> > > > > I >> > > > > > have chosen JDK6 as LibreOffice uses our ODF Validator for >> > regression >> > > > > tests >> > > > > > on very old machines. As discussed before, we plan to switch >> > > afterwards >> > > > > to >> > > > > > JDK 8 jumping directly to 0.7-SNAPSHOT to be able to use the >> latest >> > > > > version >> > > > > > of Apache Jena for our W3C RDF support. >> > > > > > In additon, the build and tests run successful under JDK 6,7,8 >> with >> > > > > Windows >> > > > > > 10 and JDK 6 and 8 under Ubuntu. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > As usually, I have checked the JavaDoc that our taglets work >> > > > successful. >> > > > > > For those new here, JavaDoc taglets are being used to create >> three >> > > > types >> > > > > of >> > > > > > generic references from the JavaDoc classes to the ODF 1.2 >> > > > specification >> > > > > in >> > > > > > HTML (elements, attributes and data types). >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > > Svante >> > > > > > ᐧ >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 2017-03-05 18:30 GMT+01:00 Svante Schubert < >> > > [email protected] >> > > > >: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > This is the vote for 0.6.2-incubating-RC1 of Apache ODF >> Toolkit >> > > > > > > (incubating). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close at the >> end >> > > of >> > > > > 11th >> > > > > > > of March (CET). >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >> > > > > > > dist/dev/incubator/odftoolkit/0.6.2-incubating-RC1/ or from >> the >> > > > Maven >> > > > > > > staging repo here: https://repository.apache.org/ >> > > > content/repositories/ >> > > > > > > orgapacheodftoolkit-1004/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with key : 862EA1DEE2EC7D45 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with >> 'FixVersion >> > = >> > > > > > > 0.6.2-incubating'. >> > > > > > > You can view them here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/ >> > > > > > > asf/incubator/odf/tags/odftoolkit-0.6.2-incubating- >> > RC1/CHANGES.txt >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.6.2-incubating release >> > > > > > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.6.2-incubating >> release >> > > > > > > because... >> > > > > > > ᐧ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Tom Barber >> > > > > CTO Spicule LTD >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > >> > > > > http://spicule.co.uk >> > > > > >> > > > > @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> >> > > > > >> > > > > Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> >> > > > > >> > > > > GB: +44(0)5603641316 >> > > > > US: +18448141689 >> > > > > >> > > > > <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > >> > > > Ian C >> > > > >> > > >> > > ᐧ >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Tom Barber >> > CTO Spicule LTD >> > [email protected] >> > >> > http://spicule.co.uk >> > >> > @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> >> > >> > Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> >> > >> > GB: +44(0)5603641316 >> > US: +18448141689 >> > >> > <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook> >> > >> > > > > -- > Tom Barber > CTO Spicule LTD > [email protected] > > http://spicule.co.uk > > @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> > > Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> > > GB: +44(0)5603641316 <+44%2056%200364%201316> > US: +18448141689 <(844)%20814-1689> > > <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook> > -- Tom Barber CTO Spicule LTD [email protected] http://spicule.co.uk @spiculeim <http://twitter.com/spiculeim> Schedule a meeting with me <http://meetme.so/spicule> GB: +44(0)5603641316 US: +18448141689 <https://leanpub.com/juju-cookbook>
