I did not yet found time time to test/use it but I know that Neogia people use 
Selenium for this job and seem quite happy with it.

http://www.openqa.org/selenium/

Jacques

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Byers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: OFBiz Testing Initiative


> For anyone following this thread, the mini conference went extremely
> well and the thing that came out of this portion was the suggestion by
> Tim Ruppert that we look at WebTest
> (http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/WebTestHome.html) for doing
> this sort of testing. It certainly seems to be what we were looking
> for. There will probably still be a place for Grinder for doing load
> testing.
> 
> -Al
> 
> On 11/3/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Al,
> >
> > this is really very interesting, thanks for sharing your ideas and
> > research results.
> >
> > Just one point (after a very quick review of your document) I see that
> > we will need to enhance the Grinder tool to better support the tests we
> > will need in OFBiz.
> > That's great, however I think that it is worth noticing (even if it is
> > probably what you have already planned to do) that it would beneficial
> > for the two projects (OFBiz and The Grinder) if all the enhancements
> > that are *not* strictly connected with OFBiz, will be
> > discussed/designed/implemented (also) in the Grinder community.
> > In this way the workload for the OFBiz community will be limited to the
> > integration stuff and the risks of having an incomplete tool and a lot
> > of new code to maintain will be lower.
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> >

Reply via email to