Yes Tim, The Firefox IDE and versatile aspect of Selenium seems very interesting. Looking forward for the results of you comparative(?) tests.
Thanks Jacques From: "Tim Ruppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Right now, I'm preparing to do a little Webtest / Selenium testing > either tomorrow or first thing next week. Selenium's got a pretty slick > Firefox IDE in addition to their APIs for doing testing. I'll try and > get everyone one feedback in the not too distant future. > > Cheers, > Tim > > -- > Tim Ruppert > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > o:801.649.6594 > f:801.649.6595 > > Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > I did not yet found time time to test/use it but I know that Neogia people > > use Selenium for this job and seem quite happy with it. > > > > http://www.openqa.org/selenium/ > > > > Jacques > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Al Byers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:30 PM > > Subject: Re: OFBiz Testing Initiative > > > > > > > >> For anyone following this thread, the mini conference went extremely > >> well and the thing that came out of this portion was the suggestion by > >> Tim Ruppert that we look at WebTest > >> (http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/WebTestHome.html) for doing > >> this sort of testing. It certainly seems to be what we were looking > >> for. There will probably still be a place for Grinder for doing load > >> testing. > >> > >> -Al > >> > >> On 11/3/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> Al, > >>> > >>> this is really very interesting, thanks for sharing your ideas and > >>> research results. > >>> > >>> Just one point (after a very quick review of your document) I see that > >>> we will need to enhance the Grinder tool to better support the tests we > >>> will need in OFBiz. > >>> That's great, however I think that it is worth noticing (even if it is > >>> probably what you have already planned to do) that it would beneficial > >>> for the two projects (OFBiz and The Grinder) if all the enhancements > >>> that are *not* strictly connected with OFBiz, will be > >>> discussed/designed/implemented (also) in the Grinder community. > >>> In this way the workload for the OFBiz community will be limited to the > >>> integration stuff and the risks of having an incomplete tool and a lot > >>> of new code to maintain will be lower. > >>> > >>> Jacopo > >>> > >>> > >>>
