Right now, I'm preparing to do a little Webtest / Selenium testing either tomorrow or first thing next week. Selenium's got a pretty slick Firefox IDE in addition to their APIs for doing testing. I'll try and get everyone one feedback in the not too distant future.

Cheers,
Tim

--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I did not yet found time time to test/use it but I know that Neogia people use 
Selenium for this job and seem quite happy with it.

http://www.openqa.org/selenium/

Jacques

----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Byers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: OFBiz Testing Initiative


For anyone following this thread, the mini conference went extremely
well and the thing that came out of this portion was the suggestion by
Tim Ruppert that we look at WebTest
(http://webtest.canoo.com/webtest/manual/WebTestHome.html) for doing
this sort of testing. It certainly seems to be what we were looking
for. There will probably still be a place for Grinder for doing load
testing.

-Al

On 11/3/06, Jacopo Cappellato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Al,

this is really very interesting, thanks for sharing your ideas and
research results.

Just one point (after a very quick review of your document) I see that
we will need to enhance the Grinder tool to better support the tests we
will need in OFBiz.
That's great, however I think that it is worth noticing (even if it is
probably what you have already planned to do) that it would beneficial
for the two projects (OFBiz and The Grinder) if all the enhancements
that are *not* strictly connected with OFBiz, will be
discussed/designed/implemented (also) in the Grinder community.
In this way the workload for the OFBiz community will be limited to the
integration stuff and the risks of having an incomplete tool and a lot
of new code to maintain will be lower.

Jacopo


Reply via email to