On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com> wrote: > > That's not what was being proposed. What was proposed was that anyone > who was 'keen enough to want to vote' should get a vote. That covers > not only people who have the best interests of the community at heart, > but also those who would want to see it damaged or even destroyed.
That's incorrect. I said: 2. Contributors. Any participant who has contributed significantly to the OpenSolaris community can be named a contributor, giving them the ability to vote in community-wide elections. And my commentary was simply that if someone's contributed then they should be entitled to a vote. Nowhere was the implication that we should hand votes to anyone regardless of contribution. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
