On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:05 AM, John Sonnenschein <johnsonnenschein at gmail.com> wrote: > Where this would run in to problems is when two communities "own" a > project with tight binding like... I dunno, like observability. X11 > wants dtrace probes, so does ON. Maybe if projects were only owned by > one community the projects would have to be defined in the scope of a > single community ( eg, observability -> X-Observability & ON- > Observability )
Observability is an obvious SIG. It goes across many different areas of code. It can interact with code owners to offer advice - or just a good push. And if it sees a gap, it can work to get a project created to fill that need. Things like observability (and systems administration) are good examples of cases where you want structures that aren't aligned with the code. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
