On Jul 31, 2008, at 21:49, John Beck wrote: > * We already have user-groups. Most communities/SIGs that don't > fall into > the user-group bucket seem to be technology related. In other > words, it > seems to be generally true (though not completely true) that the > thing > that ties each group together is a common interest in a particular > technology. Therefore I wonder if "technology groups" (or perhaps > "tech groups" for short) might be a helpful term?
Yes, I like that. S.
