>On Jan 4, 2008 7:16 AM, <Casper.Dik at sun.com> wrote: >> Nevada. (Indiana, giving an incompatible user experience and scripting >> experience is not such a release even if it aspires to be one) > >It is disingenuous at best to make such a claim when Indiana has made >no such claim that it is, as of yet, trying to be such a compatible >distribution. > >Such criticism is unproductive at best at this early stage, especially >when it was made very clear that what was released is a prototype and >nothing more.
Any attempt to stifle criticism on a prototype "because it is a prototype" has only one explanation which I can think of. What other purpose does a prototype serve? Casper
