Shawn Walker wrote: > On Jan 23, 2008 1:29 PM, Eric Boutilier <Eric.Boutilier at sun.com> wrote: >> Shawn, >> >> Sidenote: In your last post, you majorly conflated other peoples' >> concerns with my concerns. Maybe something I said prompted that... >> but whatever. The important thing is, you wrote: > > I was addressing concerns in the email that you had posted that was > from you and Peter. > > I wasn't trying to address any issues outside of the email you posted.
One of us is mixed up then. Let's take that offline though. More below... > > >> I'd say that's extremely promising news, and potentially extremely >> /excellent/ news if we hear from them directly. > > I want to be clear that neither Erast's or Moinak's assent to be a > contributor to the group is strictly an indication of agreement and > willingness to be part of the proposed Community Group. > Oh. :-( -1 from me to the proposal. (On the same grounds that I expressed in the last paragraph of the June e-mail that I copied here earlier today.) Eric
