>Ben Rockwood wrote: >> Item 4: Main Motion (benr03), language follows: 'In the best interest of >> full disclosure and transparency with the community at large which we >> represent; I resolve that the ogb-private email list be opened to public >> view; existing archived messages created prior to the adoption of this >> resolution shall be exempt as the authors interacted without the >> expectation of public review. The archive shall, therefore, be >> destroyed and henceforth public.' > >If you're going to make it public, why not just destroy it? What's the >purpose of a public ogb-private list separate from ogb-discuss or the >previously discussed ogb-business?
And I'll -1 it in advance. There are lots of things we cannot discuss in the open; any discussion about persons for one. Full disclosure is not always in the best interest of all concerned. Casper
