On 02/11/2007, S h i v <shivakumar.gn at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/2/07, Shawn Walker <swalker at opensolaris.org> wrote: > > On 02/11/2007, John Plocher <John.Plocher at sun.com> wrote: > > > Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > > > > I'm proposing that the OGB take the actions described below. > > > ... > > > > Until that time, we ask that Sun require that references to Indiana > > > > discontinue using the name 'OpenSolaris' or any other implying > > > > exclusive endorsement of the OpenSolaris Community. > > > > > > > > > Would something as simple as calling it > > > > > > Indiana 10/07 - an OpenSolaris Developer Preview > > > > > > meet the intent of this proposal? > > > > It should if you ask me; Nexenta just launched a commercial product > > today or yesterday and they seem to have no problem plastering the > > OpenSolaris trademark on their marketing materials. Seems only fair. > > > > Actually, I came across Nexentastor information early in the day and > was surprised to see *no* mention of the term "OpenSolaris" on their > site of the documentation: > http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=4&Itemid=67 > http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=77&func=startdown&id=11 > > I even look around from *some* sort of acknowledgment/reference but > couldn't find any in their documentation. > I might have missed some piece of info. Are there any other sources of info?
The first one I noticed was: "Stability of OpenSolaris" from http://www.nexenta.com/corp/ There are others, but I don't have the full list at the moment. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
