On Jun 4, 2007, at 18:12, Stephen Lau wrote: > 1) Is it necessary that you have the community group setup before > your source code is available/published? I only ask because I'm > not entirely comfortable with the idea of giving governance > representation and voting grants to a community that doesn't yet > have open code or open development.
Surely this is something of a Catch 22 situation? The only alternative is to create an "incubator" process like Apache have, where projects can be introduced with minimal process overhead and gradually come up to speed with the expected bureaucracy. S.
