Alan Coopersmith wrote: > James Carlson wrote: >> Section 7.8 of the constitution gives the actual process, which >> involves having a nomination by an existing Core Contributor and then >> a consensus vote. It doesn't say you can't ask, and it doesn't say >> you have to. > > And we've actually been ignoring the requirements in Sections 7.10 & > 8.2 which require us to set up private mailing lists for each community > to have their Core Contributors debate the merits of each nominee before > the public vote.
Strongly disagree about this, FWIW - having a set of available mailing lists for core contributors encourages private discussion about things other than who to vote in as core contributor. I'm glad we've been ignoring it :) Glynn
