On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:44:35 -0500 "Tim Dugger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So what you are saying is that if a person or company wants to use > the term d20, then they have to follow the 3.0 SRD, and not 3.5 > SRD? > > Wow! This means that the flood of OGL products for 3.5 won't happen > like it did for 3.0..... At least that is how I read it...
With the exception of any that have an over-riding need to *avoid* one of the changes in the 3.5 SRD, I doubt very many publishers will voluntarily choose not to use material from the version of D&D that is currently being supported by WotC, since that will be the version (assumedly) that the majority of the market for their own products will be using. I mean, if the ranger really was broken, and the new version really did fix it, then D&D players will adopt the new version, and d20 publishers writing material based on the old version will be shooting themselves in the foot. Assume that 90% of all d20 products announced for the remainder of 2003 will be 3.5-compliant, and that the percentage will go up in 2004. Spike Y Jones _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
