ogf-l  

Messages by Date

• 2004/04/06 [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Mark Arsenault
• 2004/04/06 Re: re[2]: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL HUDarklord
• 2004/04/06 re[2]: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Mike Dymond
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Lizard
• 2004/04/06 Re: re[2]: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL HUDarklord
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Doug Meerschaert
• 2004/04/06 re[2]: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Mike Dymond
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Fred
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL DarkTouch
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Lizard
• 2004/04/06 [Ogf-l] Re: Releasing a new system under the OGL Dominique Crouzet
• 2004/04/06 RE: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL woodelf
• 2004/04/06 RE: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Grant Erswell
• 2004/04/06 RE: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Gillispie, Bryan W.
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Peter Brink
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Fred
• 2004/04/06 Re: [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Scott Broadbent
• 2004/04/06 [Ogf-l] How to go about releasing a system under the OGL Grant Erswell
• 2004/04/05 Re: [Ogf-l] Crediting variant d20-inspired rules Lizard
• 2004/04/05 [Ogf-l] Crediting variant d20-inspired rules Michael P Hopcroft
• 2004/03/26 Re: [Ogf-l] About adapting OGC stuff HUDarklord
• 2004/03/26 Re: [Ogf-l] About adapting OGC stuff jdomsalla
• 2004/03/26 [Ogf-l] About adapting OGC stuff Dominique Crouzet
• 2004/03/20 [Ogf-l] Section 15 Add-Ons spikeyj
• 2004/03/20 Re: [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question david_shepheard
• 2004/03/19 Re: [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question Doug Meerschaert
• 2004/03/19 RE: [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question Reginald Cablayan
• 2004/03/19 RE: [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question Jim Butler
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS Moses Wildermuth
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] Warning about your e-mail account. Ian Sturrock
• 2004/03/16 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS scottgreene
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS Darkwater Press
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS Fred
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS jeff
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS scottgreene
• 2004/03/16 Re: Re: [Ogf-l] Warning about your e-mail account. scottgreene
• 2004/03/16 [Ogf-l] VIRUSES BEING SENT TO LIST MEMBERS Fred
• 2004/03/16 RE: [Ogf-l] Warning about your e-mail account. Robert J Defendi
• 2004/03/16 Re: [Ogf-l] Warning about your e-mail account. Ian Sturrock
• 2004/03/15 RE: [Ogf-l] Clark... Clark Peterson
• 2004/03/15 RE: [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question Reginald Cablayan
• 2004/03/15 [Ogf-l] SRD & WotC errata question Kevin Savage
• 2004/03/15 RE: [Ogf-l] Clark... Mynex
• 2004/03/15 [Ogf-l] Clark... The Sigil
• 2004/03/15 [Ogf-l] Message for Clark Peterson Mynex
• 2004/03/05 [Ogf-l] OGL Corrections for The Book of Unusual Treasures Benjamin Durbin
• 2004/03/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright Lizard
• 2004/03/05 SV: [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright Mikael
• 2004/03/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright dmitchell
• 2004/03/05 SV: [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright Mikael
• 2004/03/05 RE: [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright GRIM
• 2004/03/05 [Ogf-l] Wizard of Oz and Copyright DarkTouch
• 2004/03/05 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vsforbidden t... Joe Mucchiello
• 2004/03/05 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vsforbidden t... spikeyj
• 2004/03/04 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vsforbidden t... david_shepheard
• 2004/02/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden t... HUDarklord
• 2004/02/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden t... Scott Broadbent
• 2004/02/29 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden t... HUDarklord
• 2004/02/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Roddenberry, Paramount, Star Trek Lizard
• 2004/02/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Roddenberry, Paramount, Star Trek Steven "Conan" Trustrum
• 2004/02/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Roddenberry, Paramount, Star Trek Lizard
• 2004/02/28 [Ogf-l] Roddenberry, Paramount, Star Trek spikeyj
• 2004/02/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden terms in PI Scott Broadbent
• 2004/02/28 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden t... HUDarklord
• 2004/02/27 Re: [OGF-L] List Bug on Reply-Tos david_shepheard
• 2004/02/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL - white out vs forbidden terms in PI david_shepheard
• 2004/02/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Potation? Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? Damian
• 2004/02/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Potation? Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Potation? (def) Roger Bert
• 2004/02/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Potation? Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/27 RE: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL Jim Butler
• 2004/02/27 [Ogf-l] Re: Ogf-l Digest, Vol 1, Issue 1059 Rob Smith
• 2004/02/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• 2004/02/27 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? HUDarklord
• 2004/02/26 [Ogf-l] Potation? Peter Brink
• 2004/02/26 [OGF-L] List Bug on Reply-Tos HUDarklord
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL HUDarklord
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? jeff
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? jeff
• 2004/02/26 SV: [Ogf-l] Potation? Mikael
• 2004/02/26 Re: SV: [Ogf-l] Potation? HUDarklord
• 2004/02/26 Re: SV: [Ogf-l] Potation? Peter Brink
• 2004/02/26 Re: SV: [Ogf-l] Potation? HUDarklord
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Potation? Sean Mead
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Declarations & Licensed Art david_shepheard
• 2004/02/26 Re: [Ogf-l] Advantages of a new version of the OGL david_shepheard
• 2004/02/25 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g woodelf
• 2004/02/25 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g Peter Brink
• 2004/02/25 RE: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g Gillispie, Bryan W.
• 2004/02/25 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g jdomsalla
• 2004/02/25 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g Peter Brink
• 2004/02/25 Re: [Ogf-l] OGL - definition 1g Peter Brink
• 2004/02/25 Re: [OGF-L] Compatibility Declarations & OGL Scope HUDarklord
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" david_shepheard
• 2004/02/24 Re: [OGF-L] Compatibility Declarations & OGL Scope woodelf
• 2004/02/24 Re: [OGF-L] Compatibility Declarations & OGL Scope Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Joe Mucchiello
• 2004/02/24 [OGF-L] Compatibility Declarations & OGL Scope HUDarklord
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Declarations & Licensed Art HUDarklord
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Declarations & Licensed Art Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Declarations & Licensed Art Fred
• 2004/02/24 [Ogf-l] PI Declarations & Licensed Art HUDarklord
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/24 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" HUDarklord
• 2004/02/23 RE: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Jim Butler
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" david_shepheard
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/23 RE: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's notOGC" Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" woodelf
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" woodelf
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" jdomsalla
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" HUDarklord
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" jdomsalla
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" HUDarklord
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/23 [Ogf-l] Re: Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Mark Clover
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" spikeyj
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/23 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Scott Broadbent
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Doug Meerschaert
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" woodelf
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Faustus von Goethe
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" HUDarklord
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Doug Meerschaert
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" HUDarklord
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Faustus von Goethe
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Repeated Section 15 Entries Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/22 [Ogf-l] Repeated Section 15 Entries spikeyj
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Discouragement of reuse spikeyj
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/22 RE: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/22 [Ogf-l] Discouragement of reuse Fred
• 2004/02/22 RE: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/22 [Ogf-l] Product Identity does not mean "Everything that's not OGC" Martin L. Shoemaker
• 2004/02/22 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names spikeyj
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Open appology to Clark david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Fred
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names jdomsalla
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI Joe Mucchiello
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI HUDarklord
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/21 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI david_shepheard
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI david_shepheard
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Derivative Content and PI david_shepheard
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Darkwater Press
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Non-PI SRD/Sensibility DarkTouch
• 2004/02/20 [Ogf-l] Non-PI SRD/Sensibility jdomsalla
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names DarkTouch
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names DarkTouch
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names DarkTouch
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 Rob Myers
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 jdomsalla
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names DarkTouch
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names Spike Y Jones
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names HUDarklord
• 2004/02/20 Re: [Ogf-l] Section 5 spikeyj
• 2004/02/20 [Ogf-l] Section 5 Rob Myers
• 2004/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/19 Re: [Ogf-l] PI Spell Names david_shepheard
• 2004/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI Clark Peterson
• 2004/02/18 [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI Mark Clover
• 2004/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI Damian
• 2004/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI HUDarklord
• 2004/02/18 [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI Mark Clover
• 2004/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI HUDarklord
• 2004/02/18 Re: [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI HUDarklord
• 2004/02/18 [Ogf-l] Re: Derivative Content and PI Mark Clover

• Earlier messages
• Later messages