-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
L. Shoemaker

>C. A claim of PI IS a claim of ownership, just as is a copyright notice
or a trademark indicator. It's a statement that "I believe that I am the
owner of X, and I am willing to defend that claim in a court of law in
the event that I believe that you have misused X in an OGL work derived
from my work."

Maybe I missed something, but I've always interpreted PI that way.  

Part of standard language for protecting fictional characters is the
phrase 'the distinctive likeness thereof'.  Bugs Bunny, for example,
CANNOT exist as an intellectual property if the distinctive likeness of
the character is excluded.  He isn't just any rabbit, in any pose.  He
is a 6' tall, grey, bipedal rabbit with buck teeth.  Only the whole
package - name, likeness, pose, mannerisms, character concept, voice -
viewed as a whole has enough gravitas to establish a viable claim.

That is why, I believe, those items are specifically included in the
list of what can be declared PI.  They are there to allow someone who
creates a character, AND A VISUAL DEPICTION of that character, to
protect that character as PI.  The stance Martin described can't be
protected on it's own - only in the whole of the depiction of the PI
character of Martin the Assassin (tm), Taker of Life from the Infernal
Pit of Hoboken in the Grey Wastes of Hades on the Jersey Turnpike (tm).
At that point, all these nebulous things exist in a specific, concrete
form - the distinctive likeness of Martin the Assassin (tm), which IS
something that is owned under the standard definition in existing law
and which does constitute an enforceable claim of PI.  

The distinctive likeness is separate from any specific artwork the
character appears in - a piece of art is protected, but only that
particular work; copyright does not protect the characters in the
depiction by the depiction alone.  Copyright on the art doesn't prevent
another artist from using the same characters in their own art, it just
prevents the other artist from duplicating your work and claiming it as
theirs.  The protections on distinctive likeness, however, do prevent
someone from creating an original work of art that uses your character
without your approval.  That's why I can't take a Poser figure of Bugs
Bunny and animate a porno film with him and Marvin the Martian - the
distinctive likeness of both characters is protected.

Of course, I could be wrong.

Bryan 

 


_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to