Title: Message
Well, until the issue is resolved, another legal doctrine comes in to play.  Since you know or reasonably should know that this ambiguity in the contract presents a possible danger to your intellectual property, you have a duty to mitigate your damages and not put anything at risk by making a declaration that is outside the clear elements of the license or clearly protected by existing copyright law.
 
 
  
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 11:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] "D20" as Product Identity



The "ownership" requirement for PI declarations does not provide a definition of ownership, but it provides a laundry list of PI elements, many of which can't be traditionally "owned" under trademark or copyright law.

Lee

Reply via email to