> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of woodelf > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: 37 questions (was re: [Ogf-l] Re: Possible > Formation of Project) > > >Well, the list as originally proposed was designed so that "YES" > >answers were all good indicators that you were properly licensed. In > >your version, a "YES" answer means a pointless PI declaration, which > >may not make the license invalid, but does mean the author > missed the > >point of PI. > > I understand that. The problem is that "Does the PI ever appear > inside material marked as OGC?" is not the converse of "Does the PI > never appear inside material marked as OGC?", so you won't > necessarily answer 'yes' to one if you answer 'no' to the other. If > you want it to be a 'yes' answer for safe compliance, it needs to be > "Does all of your PI appear within material marked as OGC?"
I like that wording. Clearer. Martin L. Shoemaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TabletUML.com -- The UML tool you don't have to learn!
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
