That's why the question. If they're claiming PI on something that neverA list of simple questions shouldn't try and teach; it should, at the most, measure the necessary knowledge to use the OGL. Further understanding can be found elsewhere.
appears inside OGC, that's a strong hint that they missed the point of PI,
and need to do more research. It's not conclusive: someone in legal might
claim something as PI just in case someone in creative, editing, or proofing
dropped the ball and let the term slip into the OGC. But I think that
answering the question leads them to understand PI better.
DM
_______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
