In a message dated 8/24/2005 10:09:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<<Except that they are not a third-party and are the owners of the material
from which all else is derived. This does create some disparity between
them still needing to use the OGL in WotC works that include third-party
material (Unearthed Arcana, etc.), but I don't know if it extends to
something like Dragon, that is essentially an outsourced house organ where
they pay to have those OGL articles included.>>


Nobody is talking about licensing stuff from themselves.  They clearly don't need the OGL for that.

You are going off on all sorts of tangents.

Woodelf said that there are OGL'd things in some magazines and that if you look at their concept of bundling it would seem that it would make their whole magazine OGL covered (which raises tons of questions).

I can't remember if the M&M preview was just in Game Trade Magazine or also Dragon.  But Woodelf says he's seen OGL covered stuff in WotC magazines.

If we can find any example of even ONE OGL-covered thing in a WotC magazine where the whole magazine isn't treated as a covered work it sort of makes their FAQ clearly wrong.  I think it's wrong even without an example.

Lee
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to