RE: [Open_Gaming] single most valuable equity asset?

[Brad Thompson]

> Rather then create a new logo I think the best way to
> accomplish this would be to use some sort of graphic that contained a
> pie chart showing the amount of new content that the product contained.
> This would be done by a word count and you'd simply get a percentage
> based on the size of the entire work. To me this would be the only
> viable solution as to do it any other way there would always have to be
> someone there who decided what was compatible and what wasn't. And I
> believe that we all agree that none of us want that.

Many computer books have a bar-graph with various criteria to indicate who
should buy the book and what it should be used for.  Something like that may
apply here.

On a related note, on the OGF-R-L (Open Gaming Registry list) we've been
talking about review criteria (quality of content, quality of presentation,
originality of work, usefulness of work, familiarity of reviewer with work).
I'm still soliciting suggestions and comments on these criteria (and any
others you come up with).  If anyone wants to provide comments, that'd be
great.  Just subscribe to OGF-R-L.  There is an archive of the list through
5/2/00 at http://db.petrodatasource.com/archive.zip.

-Brad

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org