----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan S. Dancey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 12:08 PM Subject: Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates > From: "k.tatroe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Am I close, Ryan? > > You are right on the money. The OGL is all about making the gray areas of > IP law as they apply to RPGs go away. The more gray areas that go away, the > happier I will be. > How is this even possible, it's not like you can apply the OGL to the RPG industry, just those that decide to use it. Your not removing gray areas from anything but the OGL. And I find your intent somewhat disturbing anyway. It sounds like the "WOTC Giant" wants to step up and decree the law to all other game companies. You may not intend it that way, but that is how it comes across to this reader. Later, Ryan Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------- For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Alan Kellogg
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Lizard
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Jared Nielsen
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Alec A. Burkhardt
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Jared Nielsen
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- [Open_Gaming] Shards of the Stone d20? Jared Nielsen
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Jason Lotito
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates k.tatroe
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Voivode
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Ryan S. Dancey
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Brad Thompson
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Kal Lin
- RE: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates Dan Carreker
- Claimed vs Registered (was Re: [Open_Gaming] Some licens... Kal Lin
- Re: [Open_Gaming] Some license updates FrogGod
